ORIGINAL: A Non-Inferiority Study of Combination of Latanoprost and Timolol Formulation to Their Separate Use in Drug-Naive Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Nigerian Patients. {RCT 93803536 (Nigeria Clinical Trial Registry)}
West African Journal of Medicine 2023 December; 40(12): 1285-1290 PMID: 38259047
Keywords:
Drug-naive, Fixed combination, Glaucoma, IOP control, Latanoprost, Nigerians, Ocular hypertension, Ocular hypotensives, TimololAbstract
Background: Control of intraocular pressure continues to be the mainstay of the management of primary open-angle glaucoma. It is also one of the key factors to consider in the diagnosis and risk of conversion of ocular hypertension to glaucoma (POAG). Medical management of IOP control is central to the treatment of POAG especially in resource-poor countries.
Aim: This study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a fixed combination of front-line drugs in the medical management of glaucoma (latanoprost and timolol) compared to concomitant use of the same drugs.
Methodology: It was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in which 116 sequentially consenting participants 40 years and above were recruited and randomized to receive either a fixed combination (group A) or a concomitant combination of latanoprost and timolol (group B). The study was carried out across two tertiary centers in southwest Nigeria.
Results: One hundred and fifteen (115) patients were analysed, 58 in group A and 57 in group B. The mean age of participants was 57.9 (± 11.5) years. There were 51 (44.3%) females. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was the diagnosis in 88 (76.5%) of the participants. No statistically significant difference between the two groups at recruitment. Mean IOP reduction from baseline to day 28 was -17.30 ± 7.8 (95% CI: -15.37 to -19.15), and -14.59 ± 6.1 (95% CI: -12.98 to -16.19) for groups A and B. Group A thus had a 54.97% IOP reduction from baseline values while group B had 51.81% (p = 0.770). The mean intergroup difference (MeD) in IOP reduction (µA - µB) between the two groups on day 28 was 2.05 ± 5.74 (95% CI: 0.6 - 1.61) p=0.04.
Conclusion: The study was able to demonstrate a noninferiority relationship between the fixed combination dosage form of latanoprost and timolol as compared to the concomitant dosage forms.
